Co-Managed IT

Co-managed IT that adds capacity without taking over

Your IT team is not the problem. There are simply more hours of work than people to do them. We take the parts you choose to hand over and leave ownership exactly where it is.

Let's talk
An Amplaphi engineer working through a problem alongside a client

What this fixes

If any of this sounds familiar, this is the conversation

Your team never gets past the ticket queue

Improvement work keeps being pushed to next quarter because password resets and printer faults arrive every hour.

Cover disappears when one person is away

Leave, illness, or a resignation turns into a coverage crisis, and nobody wants to be the one on call every weekend.

Projects slip behind daily demand

The migration or the security work has been planned for months and keeps losing to whatever broke this morning.

You need a skill you cannot justify hiring for

Some work needs depth you use a few weeks a year. Hiring for it is expensive; going without it is worse.

What changes

What the business gets, not what the software does

  • Your internal team spends more time on work only they can do
  • Coverage no longer depends on one person being reachable
  • Planned projects actually finish, because delivery is not competing with the queue
  • Retention improves when your people are not permanently on call
  • You add capability without adding headcount or recruitment risk

Accountability

What we take responsibility for

Written into the scope before you sign, so there is no argument later about who owned it.

We own this

  • Whatever is written into the split, commonly first-line tickets and out-of-hours cover
  • Delivery of the projects you hand to us, to a scope your team signs off
  • Specialist workstreams you choose to place with us
  • Documenting the work we do, in your systems, in a form your team can pick up

What is included

  • An agreed, written responsibility split between your team and ours
  • Overflow and first-line ticket handling
  • Coverage during leave, illness, and hours you do not staff
  • Escalation into your team on the terms your team sets
  • Project delivery against a scope your team owns
  • Working inside your ticketing, documentation, and monitoring tools where you prefer

Not included, or depends on scope

  • Whether we work in your tooling or ours, either is possible, and it changes how the engagement is set up
  • Out-of-hours coverage windows, which are defined before you sign
  • Onsite attendance, which depends on your location
  • Access levels, which are agreed with your team rather than assumed
  • Project work, which is quoted separately from ongoing capacity

How it works

How the engagement runs

  1. Work out the split

    We sit with your IT lead and write down who owns what, category by category. Ambiguity is where co-managed arrangements fail, so this is the whole first conversation.

  2. Agree tooling and access

    We decide whose systems we work in, what access we hold, and how escalation runs in both directions.

  3. Start narrow

    We usually begin with one clearly bounded area so your team can judge the work before widening it.

  4. Review and adjust

    The split is revisited on a regular cycle. What we hold should change as your team's priorities change.

Honest fit

Who this suits, and who it does not

We would rather tell you now than three months into an engagement neither of us enjoys.

A good fit if…

  • You have an internal IT team you intend to keep and develop
  • You can name which categories of work you want to hand over
  • Your IT lead wants a partner rather than a replacement
  • You need coverage outside the hours your team works

Probably not right if…

  • You are looking to quietly replace an internal team
  • Nobody internally has time to agree and maintain the responsibility split
  • You need a fully outsourced service. That is managed IT instead
  • You want ad-hoc help with no defined boundaries

Getting started

What the transition actually looks like

Changing providers is the part everyone dreads. Here is each phase, what we need from you, and how disruptive it is.

Understand

Step 01 of 4

We go through what you have, what is breaking, and what the business is trying to do. We talk to the people who actually use the systems, not just whoever manages them.

What we need from you
Access to your current setup, time with a few key people, and an honest account of what frustrates you.
What you get
A written summary of what we found, including anything we think you should know before deciding to work with us.

Disruption to your business

None. Nothing changes during this phase, we are looking, not touching.

Straight answers

Questions we get about co-managed it

Will our IT staff feel like they are being replaced?
That worry is the main reason these arrangements fail, so we address it first. The split is written with your IT lead, they hold escalation authority, and we do not take work they have not chosen to hand over.
Do you work in our tools or your own?
Either. Working in your ticketing and documentation keeps everything visible to your team, which most internal leads prefer. If you would rather use ours, we set up reporting so nothing is hidden.
What happens if our IT lead leaves?
We hold current documentation of the environment and can widen scope temporarily while you recruit. That is one of the practical reasons to have a second party who knows the setup.
Can co-managed become fully managed later?
Yes, and it often does when a team shrinks or a lead retires. Because the split is documented, the change is a scope conversation rather than a rescue.

Wondering if co-managed it is what you need?

Describe what is going wrong. If this is not the right answer for you, we will say so rather than sell it to you.